Serveur d'exploration sur les maladies des plantes grimpantes

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Using Epidemiological Principles to Explain Fungicide Resistance Management Tactics: Why do Mixtures Outperform Alternations?

Identifieur interne : 000217 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000216; suivant : 000218

Using Epidemiological Principles to Explain Fungicide Resistance Management Tactics: Why do Mixtures Outperform Alternations?

Auteurs : James A D. Elderfield [Royaume-Uni] ; Francisco J. Lopez-Ruiz [Royaume-Uni] ; Frank Van Den Bosch [Royaume-Uni] ; Nik J. Cunniffe [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : pubmed:29377769

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Whether fungicide resistance management is optimized by spraying chemicals with different modes of action as a mixture (i.e., simultaneously) or in alternation (i.e., sequentially) has been studied by experimenters and modelers for decades. However, results have been inconclusive. We use previously parameterized and validated mathematical models of wheat Septoria leaf blotch and grapevine powdery mildew to test which tactic provides better resistance management, using the total yield before resistance causes disease control to become economically ineffective ("lifetime yield") to measure effectiveness. We focus on tactics involving the combination of a low-risk and a high-risk fungicide, and the case in which resistance to the high-risk chemical is complete (i.e., in which there is no partial resistance). Lifetime yield is then optimized by spraying as much low-risk fungicide as is permitted, combined with slightly more high-risk fungicide than needed for acceptable initial disease control, applying these fungicides as a mixture. That mixture rather than alternation gives better performance is invariant to model parameterization and structure, as well as the pathosystem in question. However, if comparison focuses on other metrics, e.g., lifetime yield at full label dose, either mixture or alternation can be optimal. Our work shows how epidemiological principles can explain the evolution of fungicide resistance, and also highlights a theoretical framework to address the question of whether mixture or alternation provides better resistance management. It also demonstrates that precisely how spray tactics are compared must be given careful consideration. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0 International license .

DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-17-0277-R
PubMed: 29377769


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Using Epidemiological Principles to Explain Fungicide Resistance Management Tactics: Why do Mixtures Outperform Alternations?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Elderfield, James A D" sort="Elderfield, James A D" uniqKey="Elderfield J" first="James A D" last="Elderfield">James A D. Elderfield</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<nlm:affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Cambridge</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Cambridge</settlement>
<region type="country">Angleterre</region>
<region type="région" nuts="1">Angleterre de l'Est</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lopez Ruiz, Francisco J" sort="Lopez Ruiz, Francisco J" uniqKey="Lopez Ruiz F" first="Francisco J" last="Lopez-Ruiz">Francisco J. Lopez-Ruiz</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<nlm:affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Cambridge</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Cambridge</settlement>
<region type="country">Angleterre</region>
<region type="région" nuts="1">Angleterre de l'Est</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Den Bosch, Frank" sort="Van Den Bosch, Frank" uniqKey="Van Den Bosch F" first="Frank" last="Van Den Bosch">Frank Van Den Bosch</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<nlm:affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Cambridge</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Cambridge</settlement>
<region type="country">Angleterre</region>
<region type="région" nuts="1">Angleterre de l'Est</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cunniffe, Nik J" sort="Cunniffe, Nik J" uniqKey="Cunniffe N" first="Nik J" last="Cunniffe">Nik J. Cunniffe</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<nlm:affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Cambridge</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Cambridge</settlement>
<region type="country">Angleterre</region>
<region type="région" nuts="1">Angleterre de l'Est</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2018">2018</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:29377769</idno>
<idno type="pmid">29377769</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-08-17-0277-R</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000272</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000272</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000272</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000272</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000272</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Using Epidemiological Principles to Explain Fungicide Resistance Management Tactics: Why do Mixtures Outperform Alternations?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Elderfield, James A D" sort="Elderfield, James A D" uniqKey="Elderfield J" first="James A D" last="Elderfield">James A D. Elderfield</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<nlm:affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Cambridge</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Cambridge</settlement>
<region type="country">Angleterre</region>
<region type="région" nuts="1">Angleterre de l'Est</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lopez Ruiz, Francisco J" sort="Lopez Ruiz, Francisco J" uniqKey="Lopez Ruiz F" first="Francisco J" last="Lopez-Ruiz">Francisco J. Lopez-Ruiz</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<nlm:affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Cambridge</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Cambridge</settlement>
<region type="country">Angleterre</region>
<region type="région" nuts="1">Angleterre de l'Est</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Den Bosch, Frank" sort="Van Den Bosch, Frank" uniqKey="Van Den Bosch F" first="Frank" last="Van Den Bosch">Frank Van Den Bosch</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<nlm:affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Cambridge</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Cambridge</settlement>
<region type="country">Angleterre</region>
<region type="région" nuts="1">Angleterre de l'Est</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cunniffe, Nik J" sort="Cunniffe, Nik J" uniqKey="Cunniffe N" first="Nik J" last="Cunniffe">Nik J. Cunniffe</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<nlm:affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Cambridge</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Cambridge</settlement>
<region type="country">Angleterre</region>
<region type="région" nuts="1">Angleterre de l'Est</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Phytopathology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0031-949X</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2018" type="published">2018</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Ascomycota (drug effects)</term>
<term>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug (MeSH)</term>
<term>Drug Resistance, Fungal (MeSH)</term>
<term>Fungicides, Industrial (administration & dosage)</term>
<term>Fungicides, Industrial (pharmacology)</term>
<term>Models, Biological (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plant Diseases (microbiology)</term>
<term>Triticum (microbiology)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Ascomycota (effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques)</term>
<term>Fongicides industriels (administration et posologie)</term>
<term>Fongicides industriels (pharmacologie)</term>
<term>Maladies des plantes (microbiologie)</term>
<term>Modèles biologiques (MeSH)</term>
<term>Relation dose-effet des médicaments (MeSH)</term>
<term>Résistance des champignons aux médicaments (MeSH)</term>
<term>Triticum (microbiologie)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="administration & dosage" xml:lang="en">
<term>Fungicides, Industrial</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="administration et posologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Fongicides industriels</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="drug effects" xml:lang="en">
<term>Ascomycota</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Ascomycota</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Maladies des plantes</term>
<term>Triticum</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Plant Diseases</term>
<term>Triticum</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pharmacologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Fongicides industriels</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="pharmacology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Fungicides, Industrial</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</term>
<term>Drug Resistance, Fungal</term>
<term>Models, Biological</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Modèles biologiques</term>
<term>Relation dose-effet des médicaments</term>
<term>Résistance des champignons aux médicaments</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Whether fungicide resistance management is optimized by spraying chemicals with different modes of action as a mixture (i.e., simultaneously) or in alternation (i.e., sequentially) has been studied by experimenters and modelers for decades. However, results have been inconclusive. We use previously parameterized and validated mathematical models of wheat Septoria leaf blotch and grapevine powdery mildew to test which tactic provides better resistance management, using the total yield before resistance causes disease control to become economically ineffective ("lifetime yield") to measure effectiveness. We focus on tactics involving the combination of a low-risk and a high-risk fungicide, and the case in which resistance to the high-risk chemical is complete (i.e., in which there is no partial resistance). Lifetime yield is then optimized by spraying as much low-risk fungicide as is permitted, combined with slightly more high-risk fungicide than needed for acceptable initial disease control, applying these fungicides as a mixture. That mixture rather than alternation gives better performance is invariant to model parameterization and structure, as well as the pathosystem in question. However, if comparison focuses on other metrics, e.g., lifetime yield at full label dose, either mixture or alternation can be optimal. Our work shows how epidemiological principles can explain the evolution of fungicide resistance, and also highlights a theoretical framework to address the question of whether mixture or alternation provides better resistance management. It also demonstrates that precisely how spray tactics are compared must be given careful consideration. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0 International license .</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">29377769</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">0031-949X</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>108</Volume>
<Issue>7</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>Jul</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Phytopathology</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Phytopathology</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Using Epidemiological Principles to Explain Fungicide Resistance Management Tactics: Why do Mixtures Outperform Alternations?</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>803-817</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1094/PHYTO-08-17-0277-R</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Whether fungicide resistance management is optimized by spraying chemicals with different modes of action as a mixture (i.e., simultaneously) or in alternation (i.e., sequentially) has been studied by experimenters and modelers for decades. However, results have been inconclusive. We use previously parameterized and validated mathematical models of wheat Septoria leaf blotch and grapevine powdery mildew to test which tactic provides better resistance management, using the total yield before resistance causes disease control to become economically ineffective ("lifetime yield") to measure effectiveness. We focus on tactics involving the combination of a low-risk and a high-risk fungicide, and the case in which resistance to the high-risk chemical is complete (i.e., in which there is no partial resistance). Lifetime yield is then optimized by spraying as much low-risk fungicide as is permitted, combined with slightly more high-risk fungicide than needed for acceptable initial disease control, applying these fungicides as a mixture. That mixture rather than alternation gives better performance is invariant to model parameterization and structure, as well as the pathosystem in question. However, if comparison focuses on other metrics, e.g., lifetime yield at full label dose, either mixture or alternation can be optimal. Our work shows how epidemiological principles can explain the evolution of fungicide resistance, and also highlights a theoretical framework to address the question of whether mixture or alternation provides better resistance management. It also demonstrates that precisely how spray tactics are compared must be given careful consideration. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0 International license .</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Elderfield</LastName>
<ForeName>James A D</ForeName>
<Initials>JAD</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Lopez-Ruiz</LastName>
<ForeName>Francisco J</ForeName>
<Initials>FJ</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>van den Bosch</LastName>
<ForeName>Frank</ForeName>
<Initials>F</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Cunniffe</LastName>
<ForeName>Nik J</ForeName>
<Initials>NJ</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; second author: Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Bentley, WA 6845, Australia; and third author: Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Phytopathology</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9427222</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0031-949X</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D005659">Fungicides, Industrial</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D001203" MajorTopicYN="N">Ascomycota</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="Y">drug effects</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D004305" MajorTopicYN="N">Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D025141" MajorTopicYN="N">Drug Resistance, Fungal</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005659" MajorTopicYN="N">Fungicides, Industrial</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000008" MajorTopicYN="Y">administration & dosage</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000494" MajorTopicYN="Y">pharmacology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008954" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Biological</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D010935" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Diseases</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D014908" MajorTopicYN="N">Triticum</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29377769</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-08-17-0277-R</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Angleterre</li>
<li>Angleterre de l'Est</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Cambridge</li>
</settlement>
<orgName>
<li>Université de Cambridge</li>
</orgName>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Royaume-Uni">
<region name="Angleterre">
<name sortKey="Elderfield, James A D" sort="Elderfield, James A D" uniqKey="Elderfield J" first="James A D" last="Elderfield">James A D. Elderfield</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Cunniffe, Nik J" sort="Cunniffe, Nik J" uniqKey="Cunniffe N" first="Nik J" last="Cunniffe">Nik J. Cunniffe</name>
<name sortKey="Lopez Ruiz, Francisco J" sort="Lopez Ruiz, Francisco J" uniqKey="Lopez Ruiz F" first="Francisco J" last="Lopez-Ruiz">Francisco J. Lopez-Ruiz</name>
<name sortKey="Van Den Bosch, Frank" sort="Van Den Bosch, Frank" uniqKey="Van Den Bosch F" first="Frank" last="Van Den Bosch">Frank Van Den Bosch</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/GrapevineDiseaseV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000217 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000217 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    GrapevineDiseaseV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:29377769
   |texte=   Using Epidemiological Principles to Explain Fungicide Resistance Management Tactics: Why do Mixtures Outperform Alternations?
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:29377769" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrapevineDiseaseV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 16:11:34 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 16:12:50 2020